home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT0675>
- <title>
- Mar. 19, 1990: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Mar. 19, 1990 The Right To Die
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 18
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST
- The Vision Is in the Details
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Statecraft is a modulator's art. "Sometimes you move
- publicly, sometimes privately. Sometimes quietly, sometimes at
- the top of your voice. And sometimes an active policy is best
- advanced by doing nothing until the right time--or never."
- </p>
- <p> Since James Baker said that on a Texas turkey shoot shortly
- before he became Secretary of State, the Bush Administration's
- conduct of foreign policy has been scathingly criticized. The
- common complaint, thrown out again last week by House majority
- leader Richard Gephardt, portrays George Bush as a visionless
- bystander in a changing world. It is a cheap critique that
- misses the point. As American primacy recedes, the trick is to
- maximize U.S. leverage by crafting creative techniques for
- disparate situations.
- </p>
- <p> By this measure, Bush's foreign policy has got it right
- almost every time, the notable exception being China. The
- President's "don't gloat" response to communism's demise has
- exactly satisfied Mikhail Gorbachev's needs--which at this
- time are also America's. So, too, the Administration's Middle
- East policy has been adroit. A combination of private pressure
- and thinly veiled public threats has pushed Israeli Prime
- Minister Yitzhak Shamir so far into a corner that even he may
- finally have no alternative but to give peace a chance.
- </p>
- <p> The Administration's German policy is the most nuanced of
- all. The Bush-Baker approach was reflected in their refusal to
- bash Helmut Kohl publicly for failing to declare the
- German-Polish border inviolate. As other Western leaders held
- press conferences to vent their spleen on the border issue,
- Washington urged privately that Kohl's coalition partners bear
- the burden of turning the Chancellor around, a result
- accomplished last week.
- </p>
- <p> Bush and Baker have never worried that a resurgent Germany
- might actually demand the lands lost to Poland after World War
- II. What does concern them is Kohl's survival. Their
- calculation is simple: Germany's continued economic, political
- and military integration into a unified Europe is essential for
- world peace. They fear that Kohl's opponents, the Social
- Democrats, might succumb to neutralism, with unforeseeable
- consequences as Germany flexes its considerable economic muscle
- in the coming effort to rebuild Eastern Europe.
- </p>
- <p> Admittedly, the payback is yet to come; Kohl's chauvinistic
- propensity to go it alone has continued unabated. But by
- publicly ignoring the Chancellor's diplomatic free-lancing,
- Bush and Baker hope for greater influence down the road.
- Throwing America's weight around, they reason, could only make
- the transition to a Europe inevitably dominated by a united
- Germany even more difficult to manage. In another time, a
- similar posture was called appeasement. So far, at least, the
- Bush-Baker policy can be viewed as smart politics, as another
- effort--to borrow Baker's words--toward trying to get
- allies and opponents "to operate on America's terms, so that
- you can then do whatever you determine it is in your interests
- to do." Given the U.S.'s diminishing economic position relative
- to Japan and Germany, "on America's terms" may be too lofty an
- ambition. But it is always wise to pursue a smooth working
- relationship with your bankers.
- </p>
- <p> How would Bush be maneuvering if he didn't have the cushion
- of an approval rating hovering around 80%? If the economy were
- on the skids and his popularity at 40%, would he revert to the
- tough-guy rhetoric that characterized his presidential
- campaign? Would he have resisted reading the riot act to Kohl?
- Would he risk alienating America's powerful Jewish lobby by
- playing hardball with Shamir? No doubt Bush will have tough
- moments somewhere along the line--and then we will have an
- answer.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-